Abuse, Authoritarianism, Culture, Ideologies, News and Current Events, Politics, Society, Violence

What Motivates India’s Authoritarian Army of Ram, the Sri Ram Sena?

On January 24th, 40 people belonging to a Taliban-like political organization — Sri Ram Sena — barged into a pub in Mangalore, India, intent on committing violence.

As near as I’ve been able to put together from incomplete and sometimes conflicting reports, the intruders  attacked several people — mostly young women, and mostly college students — who were until then peacefully enjoying the pub.  The 40 roughed up the young people, who they outnumbered, and perhaps in some instances went so far as to molest some of the girls.  Two of the young women were hospitalized.

The rationalization given by the intruders for ganging up like cowards to assault the young people was they felt they had to beat up the kids to preserve “traditional Indian norms“.  Specifically, they seemed to object to the young women drinking and dancing in public, to their manner of dress, and to their fraternization with the young men.

Who is responsible for the outrageous behavior of the 40 goons?  It seems to me that, besides the 40 goons themselves, there are at least three other groups that helped to bring about this event.  First, the leaders of the political organization to which the goons belong, the Sri Ram Sena, or “Army of Ram”.  Second, to at least some extent, those members of the media that had advanced notice of the attacks but apparently failed to make an effort to prevent them.  And last, some public servants and officials — most likely including the police — whose past and present tolerance of this kind of political violence must surely encourage it.

Yet, I am not so much concerned here with fixing blame for the event as I am concerned with the psychology of the militants involved in it.  This morning, The New York Times is running an article on the attack that represents it as a clash between the cultures of Old and New India, between the traditional and the modern.  That’s an interesting thesis, and it’s probably one valid way in which to see the event.  But it still doesn’t get at the psychology of the militants.

On the other hand, I believe Robert Altemeyer does a pretty good job of getting at the psychology of the militants.   Altemeyer has spent 40 years studying the sorts of people who it seems largely comprise the backbone of such political organizations as the Taliban of Afghanistan, the former Nazis of Germany, the Communists of the old U.S.S.R., and so forth.  He calls these people “authoritarians” and he identifies two psychologically distinct kinds of authoritarians:  followers and leaders.  A few years ago, Altemeyer published a free online book, The Authoritarians (.pdf)*.   Although the book is specifically targeted to an American audience, it goes quite far in my opinion to explain the behavior of the militants in India’s Sri Ram Sena. I would strongly encourage anyone interested in why the militants behaved as they did, and in the best ways to combat them, to read Altemeyer’s book.

As I see it, the problem underlying the attack on the young people in Mangalore is authoritarianism.  If Altemeyer and hundreds of other scientists are right, then Authoritarianism is rooted deep in human psychology and, as such, is not confined to any one society or culture, but is instead something that can and does crop up anywhere. And whenever it crops up in a democracy, such as India, it poses a threat of varying degrees to the democracy itself.  It should therefore concern all of us who are interested in promoting democracy to study it’s arch-enemy, authoritarianism.

3 thoughts on “What Motivates India’s Authoritarian Army of Ram, the Sri Ram Sena?”

  1. I had seen the headline about this attack, but had not read further. The story reminds me of something I read several weeks ago (I have no sense of the passage of time). This involved Hindus attacking Christians in India for some trumped-up reason. I listened to some talk about that stuff on either BBC or public radio, and one fellow from India referred to a group the name of which escapes me, but which is desirous of a sort of India-for-Hindus thing. Doubtless this has both religious and cultural underpinnings.

    I hope to find time to read The Authoritarians.


  2. There is much more to this incident than meets the eye, Paul. It is not just about authoritarianism but about a parochial society’s desire to control its most disadvantaged members, the women.

    There are many Indias existing side by side in the conglomeration and incidents like this highlight this fact.


I'd love to hear from you. Comments make my day.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s