Attached Love, Coffee Shop Folks, Courtship, Erotic Love, Happiness, Infatuation, Jackie, Love, Lovers, Marriage, New Love, Quality of Life, Relationships, Romantic Love, Sexuality

Should You be Friends Before You Become Lovers?

(About a 3 minute read)

“I’m here, sir, to ask for your daughter’s hand in marriage.”

“Do you like her, boy?”

“Sir, I love her more than I love anything else in the world!”

“I didn’t ask if you loved her, I asked if you liked her. Love is wonderful, but love isn’t enough by itself to get you though the arguments and tough times any husband and wife will have.”

(An old movie, the title of which I’ve forgotten.)​

There was a comet in the sky that fall, and ostensibly, Jackie and I had come out on the porch at dusk to sit under a blanket and watch it. But Jackie soon began talking about “boys”.

She was 17 that year, and though she hadn’t much experience of boys, she went into great detail about her relationships with them. It took her two hours to cover the topic, and she wrapped things up with a simple question, “What do I have to do to keep a boy? I’ll do anything you tell me to do. I’ll change myself in any way. But tell me what I have to do.”

I suggested she was looking at it the wrong way. It might not be best for her to think about changing herself to suit boys, but rather best for her to be true to herself. The boys who really loved her for who she was would appreciate that. She politely thanked me and we wandered off our separate ways.

About ten months later, Jackie stopped me on the street one day to tell me my advice had not made immediate sense to her. But she had thought about it, and over the past month or so, it had begun to click.

I think Jackie had a point. It can be hard to fully understand what it means to be true to oneself, and even more so, see the importance of that in our sexual relationships with people. But my advice didn’t really go far enough.

Had I been thinking that night of the comet, I would have gone on to suggest to Jackie that she pick her lovers from among her friends. That is, that she become friends with someone before becoming a lover to them, when at all possible.

Now, tons of folks might disagree with me there. They tell me they don’t want to do that because they’re scared of “ruining a good friendship”. Normally, I’d respect that, but in this case, I think that’s crazy talk. You can’t ruin a good friendship by becoming lovers. You can only reveal or unmask a “good” friendship for what it really is — a bad friendship. Of course, that doesn’t change the fact that it’s your choice whether you want to risk that.

Beyond that, befriending someone before becoming their lover is perhaps the best way to get to intimately know who they are as a person before you get so involved with them that it becomes hard to extricate yourself from the relationship, should that be wise to do.

Moreover, it’s much easier to see who someone is when you are not sexually passionate about them. But perhaps the best reason to pick your lovers from among your friends is that love is seldom if ever enough on which to base a committed, long term relationship.

It’s not just that, soon enough, giddy-headed romantic love wears off. Romantic love is usually replaced by a deeper bond. It’s that friendship is insurance of a more comprehensive relationship than love. You can love someone without actually liking them, but when that happens, your relationship tends to come down to little more than sex. Friendship guards against that.

Of course,  plenty of couples come together as lovers before they develop friendships for each other.  I’m not arguing that folks should absolutely forgo any romantic relationships unless they’re friends first.  But I do believe there are advantages to first being friends.

So, ideally speaking, should you be friends with someone before you become lovers?

11 thoughts on “Should You be Friends Before You Become Lovers?”

  1. I see your points here and they’re all valid. But I think every relationship is different. I know I was friends with my husband before we became lovers and we’re still happy after 25 years.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Funny thing. I totally agree that the person that one is in a long-term relationship with should be (in a sense) a friend, but I can’t imagine selecting (actively choosing) a lover from among one’s friends. That seems rather calculating.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I agree. It would be calculating to choose friends only on the basis of seeing which might make good mates. But I still think making friends first is optimal. The difference is one should not make friends solely to test them as potential mates.

      Good to see you again. Half my posts these days are written with you in mind.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thanks, Paul! I enjoy your posts, and I’m happy that you’re back to posting again! Actually, with regards to this post, the above comment is not the first response that came to my mind. I was going to write about how Love is not something you can find by looking for it, or even preparing yourself for it. Friendship intertwines with falling. Love is predestined. Soulmates belong to each other from conception, though they do not know it yet. Falling in love is not something you can summon or control, though “be true to yourself’ and ‘be sensible as much as you can’ are good rules to try to follow even if your brain is all mushed up with love. But that just sounded strange and overly poetic, so I settled for a shorter and colder response.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I’m all for cold responses! They match up so nicely with my chilly heart!

        More seriously, we firmly agree that love is not something you can chose to have for someone. And we agree there are such things as “soulmates” — at least in the sense of there are people who are so compatible with each other that they might as well be limbs of each other.

        We disagree about soulmates being predestined to find and love each other — but I imagine those are not opinions we could find a way to convince each other of.

        Of course, that doesn’t mean we could not argue back and forth like a couple of idiots about it, well past the point each of us had explained to the other our views — they do it all the time on TV!

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Ha,ha no. No convincing had crossed my mind. In fact, I wouldn’t have set the words to reveal my unproveable yet heartfelt thoughts on the subject of Love, if you hadn’t already had warning that I have a mystical bent. So… I considered that instead of shaking your head and saying, “That Carla, she’s nuts!” you would already know that I’m nuts! haha

        Liked by 1 person

      4. Being nuts is the absolute minimum requirement to read my blog, let alone post insightful comments on it, such as you so often do. I broke no exceptions ot that rule!

        Why, just six years ago, some scoundrel tried to post while still sane — obviously, he had not read enough posts yet to properly lose his mind, the slacker.

        You can imagine how disturbing that was for me.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. I was friends with my husband for years before I married him so for me at least friendship before love seems ideal. But whether one becomes friends before or after, the important thing is to be friends above all.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I was in an abusive marriage a long time ago where she and I were not friends. The sex was excellent, but never came even close to making up for the loneliness of being in the same bed with someone who wasn’t a friend.


I'd love to hear from you. Comments make my day.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s