Bad Ideas, Culture, Family, Marriage, Religion, Religious Ideologies, Sexuality

Instant Animosity: Just Add Marriage

(About a 4 minute read)

A while back a man who did not particularly like me nevertheless took the trouble to describe to me how his religious community picked partners for marriage.

Once each year, the eligible men and women would gather in a hall and then get to know each other by sitting down with one after another of the other sex for 30 minutes apiece.  No more than that.

During those 30 minutes, they would quickly inform each other what their goals were.  Say, to become a doctor and marry someone willing to have seven children.  And of course, their values, too:  “Religion is very important to me, how about you?”

What else they discussed, I don’t recall now, but it was fascinating to me.  Like everyone, I had heard of marriages where the bride and groom are not introduced to each other until the day they wed, but I’d not heard before of arranging marriages in just 30 minutes.  Nor had the thought occurred to me any such thing could work.

However, my acquaintance assured me that his community was “family oriented” because — unlike mainstream culture — it neither allowed nor practiced either birth control nor divorce.   I wasn’t surprised by that.  After hearing the basic fact that the couples made their decisions based on 30 minutes of knowing each other, I had quickly guessed there had to be strong social sanctions in place to hold them together.

I mean, can you imagine the divorce rate that would come from that practice if divorce were allowed?  In my experience, there is no loneliness in life greater or more intense than sharing a space with someone who does not much care for you.  I would nowadays flee from such a situation almost faster than I’d leave a building on fire.  But as he saw it, the marriages “worked” because the children were almost guaranteed to be raised in stable families.

Our conversation had begun as a mistake.  He was the friend of a friend, that friend was present, and so were a handful of other people.  Someone had mentioned per-marital sex, and I had thoughtlessly responded that I believed couples who wanted to make sure they were sexually compatible should practice it before marriage unless they had strong objections to it.

That prompted him to declare there was no need whatsoever to check for compatibility because men and women were designed to be compatible, you were by nature compatible with anyone.  After all, wasn’t it obvious that penises fit vaginas?

Which seemed a silly argument to me because by then in my life I had had one or two discoveries that I and someone I cared about were nevertheless incompatible in bed.

But I didn’t tell him how silly I thought his argument.  I’m pretty sure that I didn’t give him any greater reason to take a dislike to me than the opinions I did express — and those, I certainly didn’t not express forcefully, but merely factually.   Even then, I thought I had made it clear to everyone that I didn’t think it was my place to tell couples what they ought or ought not do, just what I myself believed.

So it seemed strange to me he took such an immediate and  pronounced dislike. Of course, I knew full well people were capable of such things, but this man had not struck me as having any such prejudices.  Indeed, at first, I had mistaken him for someone who basically believed in, “you do your thing, I’ll do mine, and we’ll keep out of each other’s business.”

All of which raises a question: When someone takes offense despite that you’ve given them only slight grounds to take offense, do you in some way fight back, or do you in some way withdraw?

That day, I felt no reason nor desire to retaliate, but rather I was merely repulsed, as if I’d come across something a bit gross and wanted to step around it, and I went home soon afterwards.  Yet, I do recall a sickening feeling that I had witnessed a needless tragedy without having a chance of preventing it or making it better.

I think, however, that I would have responded much differently under different circumstances.  Suppose, for example, I’d been married, my wife was present (or not), and he’d pointedly insulted her.  Hard for me to say where I might have stopped short of in those circumstances.

I know how we can’t always tell what we ourselves would do in any given set of circumstances until we actually get into such a situation.  I learned that when I was fighting fires — you can’t imagine what you would really do until you’ve done it.  I’ve seen some pretty ordinary guys improbably rise to heroic acts.

But your turn now: Has anyone ever taken a sharp dislike to you for little or no apparent reason?  If so, what did you do?

14 thoughts on “Instant Animosity: Just Add Marriage”

  1. Quite an intriguing exchange. I agree with you that 30 minutes is not nearly enough to develop a relationship and that people can be incompatible with the opposite sex. Just because men have penises and women vaginas does not mean the psychology of mating is simple. Human nature is quite complex, and cannot be bogged down to anything simple. I would have told that man that sexual desire (pertaining to the sexual organs) is different to other kinds of love like romantic love. Or so i think. I’m just a robot 😀


    1. A robot? I have long suspected as much, Teresums! That explains why you have endless energy to annoy me.

      Beyond that, I agree with you about the group’s practices, but I didn’t think he was open to suggestions on anything.


      1. Regardless, it could have been some food for thought. He didn’t need to listen, but i do find it an opinion worth sharing.


      2. Honestly, Teresums, I understand your feelings, and I think they might even be admirable because, knowing you, you want to help him. But he couldn’t follow your advice even if he wanted to. His community would not allow it.


  2. You do not say what particular community he belonged to, but you had given him excellent reason to dislike you. You had suggested that his community’s practice was not necessarily the best way of going about things. How dare you!


    1. Indeed, Paul, ever since the incident I have understandably lived in dread that I might someday, despite my best efforts not to, ejaculate another opinion in the presence of innocents. Perhaps you can imagine my sleepless nights.


  3. As regards to your final question: I cannot remember an incidence in which someone has taken a sharp dislike to me for little or no reason. That means one of 2 things. Either- no one has ever taken a sharp dislike to me, OR I (like some people on the autism spectrum- which, to my knowledge, I am not) am “mind blind” with regard to social situations, and cannot tell when someone has taken a sharp dislike to me.

    One minor point in your narrative raises puzzlement in my mind, Paul. Supposedly the eligible single folk have only 30 minutes to ‘get to know’ each other and choose a mate, but I’m thinking that they already must be acquainted. After all, such an unusual (unusual compared to the rest of our present society) community must be so small that every one knows everyone, or at least know of everyone (family reputation, ect).


    1. Actually, Carla, there is strict separation of the sexes in the community. I was thinking about that last night, though. Wondering that surely the boys and girls had seen each other now and then — how could they not, growing up in the same community? But he told me that they don’t even speak to each other, and that even married people will refuse to speak to anyone not their spouse or close relative.

      So, I am guessing that the boys and girls take note of each other from a distance only — until comes time to spend 30 minutes speaking.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. This practice of religious speed dating with resulting marriage might have some rather severe consequences, not only the marrying pair but also on a generation of offspring. Can you imagine being a functioning, rational product of such a union and being raised in such dysfunctional circumstance, especially within a wider culture with a range of dissenting beliefs and knowledge?
    As to your last question, if anyone takes instant dislike to me, it might be as much due to who they are, as to who I am, and I would wander away thinking, maybe, that such occurrences are unfortunate but unavoidable, and might happen to anyone. G


  5. This sounds more like arranged marriages than any real choice. Most of us try to make a good first impression, but then then with time true personality comes out – good or bad. It also sounds like speed dating.


    1. Good points, although I’d be quick to add that I think 30 minute marriages are even more risky than arranged marriages. Arranged marriages at least take a while to arrange!


  6. “In my experience, there is no loneliness in life greater or more intense than sharing a space with someone who does not much care for you.” – This statement stood out, it is not only lonely but self destroying to be in such a space. I cannot recall a time when someone has taken a sharp dislike to me, and even if they did maybe they never voiced or showed it. But I know people who have avoided me, I have wanted to ask why but I think they have more issues than I am keen to know.


I'd love to hear from you. Comments make my day.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s